Archive for June, 2009

A Word That Triggers People to Raise Their Defences

17 June 2009

Project Communications ManagementIf a project team member performed a task incorrectly, don’t try to fix the mistake by saying: “You SHOULD do it this way.” or “You SHOULD have asked for help sooner.”

The word SHOULD conveys a message of authority and superiority—you know more than someone and you are not afraid to tell them. Based on instinct, the other person will most likely raise their defences to justify their actions or inactions. Moreover, you will likely lecture the other person on how to do things correctly instead of mentoring them on how to identify and avoid potential problems on their own in the future.

“It looks like you had a rough time in completing that task within budget. What can we do differently next time?” By avoiding the word SHOULD, the conversation focuses on collaborative problem solving.

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

A Word Project Managers Can Live Without

15 June 2009

Project Communication ManagementConsider the two sentences below.

“You did a great job on that presentation BUT I didn’t like the colour that you used on the pie chart.”

“You went through a lot of trouble to negotiate that contract BUT your effort was futile.”

Instead of using the word BUT, try using the word AND instead—or don’t use the word BUT at all. The word BUT negates the sentence that preceded it. Using the word AND forces you to state the compound sentence in a positive way.

“You did a great job on that presentation AND the pie chart would have had a stronger impact if a different colour was used to highlight the issues.”

“You went through a lot of trouble to negotiate that contract. We’ll use what we learned from it to close the deal next time. Good work!”

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Your Project’s Highest Risk

11 June 2009

Project MentorBelieve it or not, your project’s highest risk is actually YOU, the project manager. Think about it.

If something happens to you, how will that impact your project? I’m not talking about fatalities but just the usual incidents that can occur such as short-term illness, temporary disability, family emergency and flu outbreak.

If you do not have a trusted backup who can run meetings on your behalf, then now is a good time to start mentoring that up-and-coming associate project manager or that eager project team leader. Give them opportunities to chair some of your meetings. Continue to coach them to take on additional project management responsibilities. In doing so, they will get motivated by the challenge; you will minimize your risks; and you will free up some of your time to take on bigger challenges. It’s a win-win situation.

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Wrong Approach to Weekly Project Meetings

5 June 2009

Weekly Project Meetings: Look AheadNeal Whitten presented at PMI-SOC last night. It was good to be reminded of the correct purpose of weekly project meetings. You see, we all have weekly project meetings but quite often we tend to use the wrong approach during the meetings.

Weekly project meetings should focus on anticipating potential problems, preparing corrective actions to prevent potential problems and getting a sense of the overall progress of the project.

Instead of starting your meetings by asking which tasks were completed and which ones were not, start by inquiring about potential problems that may come up next week, next month and so on. Based on the information, you can then come up with corrective actions. After that, you can shift the focus on the third priority, that is, to get a sense of the overall progress of the project.

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Don’t Dismiss Options Without Considerations

2 June 2009

DecisionAs a manager, you need to keep all of your options open. At project meetings, watch out for the following pitfalls which can lead to poor decisions.

Ad hominem: in Latin, it means “argument against the man.” Another person may attack the person who proposed the idea in order to discredit the merit of the idea.

Frozen evaluation: “We tried it five years ago and it did not work!” Unless all of the underlying factors five years ago are exactly the same as that of today, it is worthwhile to revisit the previous options.

Personal perspective: “I personally don’t like that option; therefore, we should not pursue it.” Incorporate the group’s perspectives in addition to your own before making the final decision.

If we don’t keep our blinders in check, it is easy to unknowingly dismiss options without proper considerations.

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.