Archive for the ‘Business Analysis’ Category

A Better Way to Present Dashboard Reports

13 May 2009

rag-statusProject managers often use Dashboard Reports to provide weekly progress updates.

Dashboard Reports typically list the work packages or phases in the WBS along with their corresponding statuses (RAG Status: Red, Amber or Green), e.g., Package 1 is Green; Package 2 is Yellow; and Overall is Green. For the next reporting period, Package 2 might be reported as Red if the issues were not rectified properly.

Unfortunately, project sponsors “might be OK with it” after realizing the complex dependencies across departments that contributed to Package 2 being Red. The finger-pointing may continue without resolving the issues for weeks onwards.

To resolve such issues, list each team leader or department in the Dashboard Report and give each one a RAG Status. In doing so, the accountability shifts to a team or a department instead of a “nameless” work package or phase.

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

ACORN Test for Project Charters

27 April 2009

ACORN TestAn important component of the project charter is a measurable project objective. Use the ACORN Test to check if the project objective is well-defined.

Accomplishment: Focus on results instead of behaviours (“decrease complaints by 5%” is better than “increase customer satisfaction”)

Control: Define a project objective that the team can control. The team can control project costs but not foreign exchange rates.

Objective: Ensure that the project will be considered a success if the project objective, by itself, was achieved. Otherwise, sub objectives will need to be defined (not necessarily required to pass the O and R portions of the ACORN Test).

Reconciliation: Avoid conflicting or duplicating the project objectives of other projects. Do not work in isolation. Check with other project managers.

Numbers: Quantify the project objective (“5% faster than the industry benchmark” is better than “improve system performance”)

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

ISO 9001:2008 What You Need to Know

24 April 2009

ISO 9001:2008In the April 2009 issue of Quality Progress, John E. “Jack” West described that minor revisions in the new fourth edition of the International Organization for Standardization’s quality management standard (ISO 9001:2008) can lead to major benefits.

Other than clarifications of certain terms, there are no new requirements. The clarifications also make ISO 9001:2008 more compatible with the environmental management standard (ISO 14001).

“ISO 9001:2008 clarifies legal requirements, outsourcing, competence, design and development, internal audit, monitoring and measurement of processes, and control of nonconforming product.

The new version can be used as a way to improve your organization’s quality management system and profitability.

There is a 24-month implementation plan.”

Given that minimal changes are required, West suggests using the revision as an excuse to review the existing quality management systems (QMS) of organizations and to upgrade as needed.

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Communicating with the Younger Generation

20 April 2009

project communications managementYou may know ASAP, B2B, FAQ, IMHO and WBS. How about 10q, BTW, ROFL, TGIF and W8?

My younger sister, in her mid 20s, used to send text messages and e-mails using some of the abbreviations above. In contrast, I still subscribe to the old school of writing. So, when she started working for IBM, I told her to get her act together. Thankfully, she did. Now, we have Twitter!

As managers, leaders or parents, however, we still need to effectively communicate with the younger generation every day. If we want to gain a better understanding of their world, we need to know some of their lingo—regardless of how much they debase proper English usage. In doing so, we can increase our effectiveness in managing, leading and guiding them in the right direction.

Check out Wiktionary for more info.

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

What is missing in the PMBOK® Guide Fourth Edition Collect Requirements process?

1 April 2009

PMBOK® Guide Fourth EditionI applaud the new Collect Requirements process in the Project Scope Management knowledge area of the PMBOK® Guide Fourth Edition. Although eight tools and techniques were listed, I did not see practical tips to discern the advantages and disadvantages of each tool or technique. Such guidelines would have been useful for project managers when deciding which tool or technique to use. I am hoping to see it on the next edition.

Interviews—ideal if you have few stakeholders who are all located in one place; the disadvantage is it takes too much time to do

Focus groups, facilitated workshops, group creativity techniques and group decision making techniques—project managers should watch out for groupthink

Questionnaires and surveys—potential problems with low response rates

Existing stuff—valuable source of requirements; not even mentioned in the PMBOK Guide

What do you think? Please click on the comment link to share your thoughts.

Connect with Dr. John A. Estrella via Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.